|
Egyptian politics boils down to
Mubarak and the Islamists*
By Paul Marshall**
February 23, 2006
THE SHOCKWAVES OF
HAMAS'S ELECTORAL victory were felt keenly by everyone in the Middle East, not
just the Israelis. In fact, few people watched the Palestinian election returns
with more hope, trepidation, or calculation than the Egyptians.
Hamas was
established in 1936 as an offshoot of Egypt's own major opposition group, the
Muslim Brotherhood, the world's oldest Islamist organization. Founded in 1928 by
Hassan al-Banna, the Brotherhood remains a central source of radicalism
throughout Sunni Islam. In recent decades it has forsworn violence within Egypt,
but the Brotherhood still advocates the killing of Israelis in Israel and
Americans in Iraq and proclaims that it wants a new caliphate. On December 22,
its head, Mohammed Mahdi Akef, echoed Iranian president Ahmadinejad, claiming
that "Western democracy has attacked everyone who does not share the vision of
the sons of Zion as far as the myth of the Holocaust is concerned."
The Brotherhood
scored its own notable successes in Egypt's December parliamentary elections. To
avoid provoking stronger government repression, it contested less than a third
of the seats and still ended up winning 88 out of 454 seats. It was quite a
triumph given that some of the Brotherhood's activists were killed during the
campaign while others were arrested or otherwise harassed. Furthermore, since
Egyptian law forbids religious parties, Brotherhood candidates could not run
under a common party banner. Many observers believe the organization could have
achieved a much larger victory in a more open election.
The Brotherhood's
success reflects Egyptian society's increased Islamization, fueled by workers
returning from stints in the Gulf and increased Saudi funding, including support
for the Al-Azhar university system and other central Sunni institutions. To be
sure, Egypt retains its own distinct patterns. In the south, Bob Marley is
remarkably popular, and jokes proliferate--one of the latest: "What's Egypt's
major export? Jokes." But that usually reliable indicator of Islamization, the
number of burka-enshrouded women, has increased noticeably in Cairo, Alexandria,
and other cities.
Islamists have
sought to allay growing fear in Egypt's ancient Coptic Christian community, the
largest religious minority in the Middle East, but the Brotherhood's election
slogan, "Islam is the solution," stokes those concerns, especially in view of
Hamas's victory. In addition, the Copts are still reeling after thousands of
angry Muslims in October mobbed St. George Church in Alexandria, leading to four
deaths, following accusations that the church had put on a blasphemous play two
years before. Their fears have multiplied as Islamists use the Danish
Jyllands-Posten cartoons as an excuse to attack not only Westerners but also
Middle Eastern Christians. Meanwhile, the Hamas-led Bethlehem Council has called
for the reinstatement of a jizya tax upon non-Muslims, while, back in
Egypt, Mohamed Habib, the first deputy of the Brotherhood's supreme guide,
averred that "Islamic Rule" means "that non-Muslims can have no authority over
Muslims."
Egypt's liberals,
such as Hisham Kassem, head of the new daily Al Masry al Youm, think the
Brotherhood's apparent strength may be misleading, since it faces little
competition. Hosni Mubarak's regime has for decades choked off the media and
human rights organizations and strictly controlled civil society--thus
prohibiting any grassroots organizations from challenging Mubarak or the
Brotherhood for political influence. Ayman Nour, the second leading vote-getter
in the September presidential election, was sentenced in December to five years
of hard labor on what most observers believe are trumped-up charges of forging
signatures on his Ghad (Tomorrow) party's application for legal recognition.
This event prompted the United States to suspend trade talks with Egypt.
The Islamists have
been resilient. In the '80s and '90s, brutal repression by state security
destroyed the Brotherhood's violent splinters Gamaat Islamiya and Islamic Jihad.
This prompted Gamaat's "spiritual leader" Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman to move to
New Jersey, where he led the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, while Jihad's
leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, who also fled Egypt, went on to help found al Qaeda.
But the main organization has held to nonviolence, kept its head down, and
patiently organized through Egypt's professional associations and networks of
mosques. The Brotherhood has also, it is said, intimidated and even infiltrated
Mubarak's police, who tread lightly when it comes to mosques.
Since the rest of
Egypt's opposition could maintain no such network, Mubarak has effectively
ensured that the short-term choice, for America and Egyptians, is him or the
Islamists.
Essam el-Erian, the
Brotherhood's main conduit to Western media, is affable and gregarious as he
seeks to allay fears of an Islamist state but declines to answer concrete
questions. Two subjects get a rise out of him. One is the role of Islamic law,
sharia, which he told me last month "is none of America's business," even
though, if enforced by a Brotherhood government, it would amount to a
state-coerced caste system of religion, sect, and gender. The other is support
for civil society in Egypt, which "America absolutely should not do." El-Erian's
response reveals the Brotherhood's fear of robust alternatives to both it and
the regime. This is something for U.S. policymakers to keep in mind.
President Bush has
said that elections are only "the beginnings of democracy," but they need not
even be that. Without security, a free press, free debate, a robust
opinion-shaping civil society, parties that have been able to organize and
mature, and, not least, a range of choices for the electorate--none of which
Egypt has--elections can prove hollow.
But Egypt has far
more advantages than the Palestinian territories. It has breathing space, with
six years until its next presidential election. And it has a talented but
hitherto smothered population that could, if given the chance, contribute
mightily to the growth of free institutions.
___________________________________
* From the
Weekly Standard,
Volume 011, Issue 23
**Paul Marshall, who was recently in Egypt, is senior fellow at Freedom House's
Center for Religious Freedom and the editor of, most recently, Radical
Islam's Rules: The Worldwide Spread of Extreme Shari'a Law (Rowman &
Littlefield, 2005).
The opinions in this article reflect that of the author and not necessarily that
of Freedom Now or Sliwa News, which is an independent, non-partisan and
alternative media service. |